The downside of having a site that is increasing in traffic and doing well
in search engine rankings (for certain topics) is that you start attracting the
occasional undesirable. My site has been attacked by a few trolls whose
life mission is to be an incompetent ass. Luckily, their visits have
still been pretty rare -- or they just deem my articles to be
untroll-worthy. But I have seemed to drag in several marketers and
spammers over the last several weeks, and their comments are often even more
irritating and mind-melting than the trolls.
The joke is on them, though. I have a pretty effective spam filter
that has caught their shenanigans every time, so their prose have been entirely
missed by the general public.
I am not opposed to self-promotion and marketing. But I am opposed to
blatant self-promotion and marketing, where it is obvious your only purpose for
being on the site is to shill your wares. A blatant plug is just a sign
of laziness and an incredible lack of creativity. Those really aren't two
traits you should have if you aspire to be a successful marketer.
I admit that I can be a self-promoter. If it is on my blog or my own
social media accounts than I'll even be pretty blatant about it. When
you're in a profession like freelance writing, I really have to self-promote if
I have any hope of getting read and creating a small name for myself. I
realize you need to promote and market if you want your products to be
known. By all means, blatantly shill on your own blogs and social media
sites. But don't think I'm up for your little games on my own blog.
Almost every bit of literature on social media marketing will say that one
of the most effective ways to promote your product is creating a presence
through interacting on social media. One of the best ways to interact and
create a presence is to leave comments on blogs -- especially on popular blogs
(which I'm not claiming my blog is, and I'm sure if it was, I'd be greeted by
far more awful spammers). I actually do agree with this strategy. I
am not opposed to a marketer leaving a comment on my blog.
I frequent several blogs, and I'll often leave a comment. I also admit
that one of the reasons that I leave comments is to get a link to this on blog
on their site. My comments are definitely a form of marketing, and I am
essentially doing the same thing as these spammers and marketers. The
major difference is that I'm doing it properly and they are utterly failing.
When I want to leave a comment on a blog, so that I can leave behind a link
and hopefully get a few new people to check out my site, I have a few easy
strategies in place. First off, I read the actual blog post.
Reading a blog post is a pretty crucial step, and is the most important
step. It then allows you to know what type of comment you should actually
be leaving. Then when I leave a comment, I make sure it actually is a
response to the article. I also make sure that I am actually engaging in
the conversation and possibly helping to stimulate more dialogue. My comment
contains substance that either brings some new information or possibly adds a
personal anecdote. Essentially, I try to write a comment that is
entertaining and brings value. Then hopefully it will make other readers
think, "That dude is one smart and witty muffin, and I want to read more
of his delicious and nutritious words."
So, basically my comments are exactly the kind of comments that a writer
wants to read on his site. There is no shilling, but just a comment that
really engages with the article. You start posting many of these
comments, and you build a rather strong reputation on that site. It'll
likely intrigue more people to check out the link, and so they can read what
else you have to offer. It builds the real and authentic relationship
that all the marketing materials claim is the future that is Web 2.0.
This isn't what spammers do. I'm not sure if the majority of the
comments are from automated bots or if it is just people that really suck at
being subtle. Typically, you end up with comments that show they have no
clue what your article is really about and they just beg you to click on their
link. They do try to tie their shill in with the post, but usually it is
just finding a word in the title that has something to do with their product.
For example, this is the type of comment I'd likely get from a spammer or
failed marketer on this post.
CannedHamJoe says:
Great Post! Spam sure is a convenient lunch meat. Did you
know "Trapped Ham In A Tin" tastes just like real ham! Click
this link to buy some yummy gelatine gloop meat deliciousness.
This wouldn't make it past my spam filter. I wouldn't approve it to
make it to the site. So, that becomes one epic failure in marketing.
Now, if this guy talked about his annoying experience with a spammer, and
then posted a link to his site, there is a good chance I may have checked out
the link. Once I found it was about canned ham, I'd have quickly left
it. I'd have left the comment around, and maybe some other person would
discover him and get their not-quite-meat needs met.
Now, if a marker really, really, really, really needs to talk about their
product, then they at least need to make the effort to ensure the article is
actually about what they're pimping. If an article is moaning about the
lack of high quality glow in the dark underwear, then by all means pitch in
with your magical undergarment that not only glow but massage your ass.
I'm sure the poster and the readers will be forever thankful.
It comes down to this, marketers you're failing. You're commenting in
the most incompetent way imaginable. I see through your lousy posts, and
I have no desire for you to litter up the comments section. It is time to
change your strategy. I've given you some tips; now, we’ll see if you can
do it better next time.
Comments
Post a Comment